Try this now: stand near a wall for support. Slowly rise onto your toes over 2 seconds and lower over 3 seconds. If that hurts in a pinpoint spot on your Achilles or patellar tendon — you've just identified tendinopathy. Now try this: hold the raised position for 45 seconds with moderate effort. For most people, the pain actually drops during the hold. That's isometric loading working — and it's your first treatment rep.
Think of your tendon like a rubber band that's been overstretched too fast — the middle goes cloudy and weak. Here's the strange part: that cloudy section causes zero pain. The pain comes from the healthy rubber band surrounding it, screaming as it takes the full load alone. The fix: stress the healthy part slowly and heavily, every other day, until it builds enough strength to share the load again.
Try this now: slowly rise onto your toes and hold for 45 seconds with real effort. Pain should drop during the hold, not spike.
If pain decreases during a sustained hold — that's isometric loading working. You've just done your first treatment rep and confirmed the diagnosis at the same time.
Takes 60 seconds. No equipment needed.
What's Actually Going On
Cook & Purdam (2009, revised 2016) describe tendinopathy as a progressive continuum — not sudden damage, not inflammation. Each stage has a different structure, a different pain pattern, and a different management approach.
| Feature | Reactive | Dysrepair | Degenerative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reversibility | Full | Partial | Structural — no. Functional — yes |
| Pain on loading | Sharp, highly irritable | Warms up, flares after | Low irritability until overloaded |
| Recovery time | Days (if load managed) | Variable — easily flared | Prolonged from flares |
| Collagen | Mostly intact | Separating, disorganising | Disorganised, cell death |
| Treatment focus | Isometrics + load removal | HSR — rebuild matrix | Build capacity of healthy tissue ("the donut") |
Key insight: pain and structure are dissociated
Patients with severe degenerative changes on MRI can be completely pain-free. Elite athletes compete with structurally significant tendon pathology. Pain is driven by load-sensitive reactive tissue around the damaged core — not the damage itself. This is why treating the imaging finding fails, and why building load capacity succeeds.
How to Identify It
Rotator cuff note
Physical exam reliably diagnoses rotator cuff tendinopathy as "shoulder impingement" (+LR <2.0 for isolated tendinopathy). If structural tear suspected — ultrasound or MRI. Imaging is rarely required in the first 12 weeks unless red flags are present.
Red Flags
The Debate
Cook & Purdam, 2009
Tendon pain is directly driven by structural changes in the dysrepair/degenerative matrix
Rio et al. 2015; Plinsinga et al. 2017
Patients with severe pain often have normal imaging; severe degeneration frequently exists in pain-free athletes
Follow the new evidence. Pain is a central sensitisation and peripheral nerve phenomenon — not a structural report. Stop telling patients "the scan shows why you're in pain."
Alfredson, 1998
Isolated eccentric loading is required for tendon healing — 3×15 reps, 2×/day, 7 days/week
Beyer et al., AJSM 2015
Heavy Slow Resistance produces equal clinical outcomes with 3×/week sessions — far better compliance than 7×/week eccentrics
Default to HSR. 3 days per week at 100% adherence beats 7 days per week at 50%. Reserve Alfredson for patients who specifically prefer it.
Cook & Purdam, 2009
New blood vessel ingrowth brings pain nerves; eliminating vessels eliminates pain
Cook et al., BJSM 2016
Doppler neovascularity persists in fully asymptomatic, high-functioning athletes post-recovery
Ignore vessel status as an outcome measure. Load capacity is the only meaningful metric. Sclerosing injections targeting vessels are not supported as primary treatment.
Honest Limitations
Research: Alfredson protocol = 168 sessions total (2×/day, 7 days/week, 12 weeks).
Reality: Real-world adherence is 40-60% of prescribed sessions. At below 50%, the mechanical stimulus is insufficient to drive collagen remodelling.
Adjustment: Default to HSR (84 sessions total). Fewer, better sessions beat more, skipped ones.
Research: HSR achieves over 90% compliance in supervised gym settings with physiotherapy oversight.
Reality: Home exercise quality degrades significantly — patients reduce load, skip reps, self-modify when pain spikes, removing the adaptation signal.
Adjustment: Front-load supervision in weeks 1-4 when load titration is critical. Transition to home only after loading parameters are established.
Research: The continuum model describes three stages with distinct management pathways.
Reality: Differentiating dysrepair from degenerative tendinopathy is impossible clinically without ultrasound tissue characterisation or MRI — not available in most routine assessments.
Adjustment: Use irritability-based staging. High irritability (pain >5/10, recovery >48h) = reactive management. Low irritability = HSR. Structural staging is a research classification, not a clinical tool.
What Works
Tier 1 — Strong Evidence
Tier 2 — Moderate Evidence
Exercise Prescription
Alfredson Alternative (if patient prefers eccentrics)
3×15 slow heel drops off a step (straight knee + bent knee variants). 2× daily, 7 days/week. 12 weeks total. Add weight via backpack when pain-free. Equal outcomes to HSR — but requires 168 sessions vs 36. Evidence: Beyer et al. 2015 (n=58, no significant difference in VISA-A at 12 weeks).
Return to Training
All criteria must be met before returning to explosive/reactive loading. Progress through milestones — do not jump to plyometrics before bilateral loading is pain-free.
The Nuance
Metabolic risk factors are often the hidden driver
Diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome impair tenocyte function — the cells responsible for maintaining tendon structure. Two patients with the same training load can have very different outcomes based on metabolic health. Gut health, insulin sensitivity, and body composition are directly relevant to tendon recovery speed.
The "pain monitoring model" is not permission to ignore flares
Accepting pain up to 4-5/10 during loading is valid — IF it settles within 24 hours. If consistently returning to 5+/10 the morning after, the load is too high regardless of what the protocol says. The 24-hour rule is the dosing guide.
Imaging pathology is not a prognosis
Structural degeneration on ultrasound or MRI does not predict future symptoms. Advising patients to avoid activity because "the scan looks bad" causes fear-avoidance and demonstrably worsens outcomes. An honest conversation about imaging limitations is part of the treatment.
Machines outperform free weights during active rehabilitation
Machine-based loading controls joint angle and eliminates balance demands — standardising the mechanical load on the tendon. Early introduction of heavy free weights can cause erratic loading spikes during balance corrections, triggering flares. Barbell work belongs in late-stage return to sport, not during the tissue-rebuilding window.
Sources
How strong is the evidence for the claims in this review? Higher = more confidence the claims are supported. This does not measure how large the effect is or how important it is compared with other levers.
Physio conditions reviewed against clinical evidence. What works, what doesn't, and what to do — from a practising physiotherapist.
Subscribe freeThe Verdict is built by the same team behind Precision Metrics — a physique and health coaching practice with 300+ clients coached. Dr. Seth Holbrook, DPT and Luke Holbrook lead the coaching.
Book a free consultationConviction-scored verdicts on supplements, nutrition, training, physio, and recovery.