Summary: A hip replacement takes away the worn-out joint and the pain that comes with it — that part works brilliantly. But the muscles around your hip have been weakening for years before surgery, and the operation makes them even weaker. Without proper strength training afterward, most people end
Total hip arthroplasty replaces the damaged ball-and-socket joint with a prosthetic implant. The surgery reliably eliminates arthritic joint pain — but it does not automatically restore muscle strength, power, or neuromuscular control.
The hip abductors (gluteus medius and minimus), quadriceps, and hip flexors undergo chronic atrophy from years of pre-surgical disuse and then additional surgical trauma. Without targeted progressive loading, strength deficits of 20%+ compared to healthy controls persist for years post-operatively.
Modern implant materials (highly cross-linked polyethylene, ceramic-on-ceramic bearings) and surgical techniques (capsular repair, larger femoral heads ≥36mm) have dramatically improved intrinsic joint stability — allowing more aggressive rehabilitation than traditional protocols permitted.
Patient side-lying, leg passively abducted to 30° — positive if leg drops. Detects gluteus medius/minimus tears.
Hip/knee flexed 90°, patient resists internal rotation force — positive if lateral hip pain. Best test for GTPS.
Ankle on opposite knee, lower knee toward table. Lateral pain = GTPS; groin pain = intra-articular.
Single-leg stance on surgical side. Low sensitivity but high specificity for abductor dysfunction.
Unremitting rest/night pain, fever, wound drainage. Screen with D-Dimer (Sn 81.3%, Sp 81.7%) + CRP (Sn 90.4%, Sp 70%).
Lateral hip pain onset 2-12 months post-op. Frequently misattributed to normal surgical pain. Use Resisted External Derotation + Hip Lag Sign.
"Start-up" thigh pain with weight-bearing. Progressive worsening. Requires radiographic assessment.
The research: PRT protocols prescribe 2-3x/week at 85-90% 1RM.
The reality: Compliance drops to 39% at 2 weeks and 28% at 6 weeks. Most patients stop once basic pain-free function returns.
Clinical adjustment: Front-load education on the 20%+ strength deficit reality. Use LSI testing at 3 and 6 months as re-engagement triggers.
The research: Greatest adaptations used 4x5 at 85-90% 1RM on leg press and knee extension machines.
The reality: Most patients lack gym access. Bands and bodyweight cannot replicate the necessary load intensity.
Clinical adjustment: Supervised clinic sessions 2x/week for heavy loading, supplemented by home program for endurance and neuromuscular control.
The research: THA provides excellent pain relief, but profound muscle deficits persist indefinitely without targeted rehab.
The reality: Rapid pain relief creates a false sense of complete recovery, leading to premature PT discharge.
Clinical adjustment: Set expectations pre-op: "The surgery fixes the joint; rehab builds the muscle back. Both halves are equally important."
High-load, low-rep strength training: 4x5 at 85-90% 1RM (leg press, knee extension, hip abduction). Up to 81.7% improvement in rate of force development vs standard care. Home variant: 3-4x10-12 at 8-12 RM (squats, step-ups, lunges).
Timeline: measurable gains at 6-8 weeks; approach symmetry at 6-12 months.
Day 0-1 post-op, weight-bearing as tolerated. 10-20 min bouts, daily. Reduces DVT risk, prevents deconditioning.
10 electrically elicited contractions at max tolerable intensity, daily in Phase I. Targets arthrogenic quadriceps inhibition.
Sensorimotor control, dynamic stabilization, proprioceptive training. Excellent for proprioception and postural control.
AAOS 2024 recommendation for low-risk, motivated patients. NOT suitable as sole intervention for frail or significantly impaired patients.
Phase IV (12+ weeks): 3x8-10 reps, bodyweight to 150% BW, 2x/week. Requires >80% LSI in quads and glutes. Limited direct THA evidence.
"Successful surgery" and "full functional recovery" are not the same thing. THA has a ~95% success rate for pain relief and basic mobility — but only 60-70% of patients who complete structured PRT normalize their strength to within 10% of their uninvolved limb. Without PRT, that number drops below 30%.
The strongest predictor of returning to a specific sport is previous pre-surgical experience and baseline fitness in that exact sport. Patients who were already active before surgery get the best outcomes afterward.
The high-impact sport question remains genuinely uncertain. Modern implant tribology has reduced wear rates dramatically, and up to 82% of patients return to sport — but definitive long-term data on whether heavy loading accelerates aseptic loosening is still missing. This is a shared decision between patient, surgeon, and physical therapist based on individual risk tolerance and functional goals.
What would change this: A multi-center RCT (n≥600, 5-year follow-up) comparing early heavy PRT vs moderate rehab with periprosthetic bone density (DEXA) and implant revision rate data.
How strong is the evidence for the claims in this review? Higher = more confidence the claims are supported. This does not measure how large the effect is or how important it is compared with other levers.
Physio conditions reviewed against clinical evidence. What works, what doesn't, and what to do — from a practising physiotherapist.
Subscribe freeThe Verdict is built by the same team behind Precision Metrics — a physique and health coaching practice with 300+ clients coached. Dr. Seth Holbrook, DPT and Luke Holbrook lead the coaching.
Book a free consultationConviction-scored verdicts on supplements, nutrition, training, physio, and recovery.