If you broke your heel in a fall and nobody has checked your back, say so at your next appointment. Ask directly whether your spine was imaged. The same force that crushed the heel bone travels straight up the skeleton, and the spine is the injury that stays quiet while everyone looks at the obviously broken foot. Takes less than 2 minutes. No equipment needed.
The heel bone is a thin shell packed with honeycomb, and landing from height drives the ankle bone down through it like a wedge splitting a log. The shell knits back together reliably. The smooth cartilage lining the joint just above it does not, which is why pain arriving six months later is usually arthritis in that joint rather than a break that failed to heal.
If you broke your heel in a fall and nobody has checked your back, say so at your next appointment. Ask directly whether your spine was imaged.
The same force that crushed the heel bone travels straight up the skeleton, and the spine is the injury that stays quiet while everyone is looking at the obviously broken foot.
Takes less than 2 minutes. No equipment needed.
The Verdict
Two large trials found surgery gave people no better heel than not operating, and caused more complications.
The heel bone is a thin shell packed with honeycomb, and landing from height drives the ankle bone down through it like a wedge splitting a log. The shell knits back together reliably. The smooth cartilage lining the joint just above it does not, which is why pain that arrives six months later is usually arthritis in that joint rather than a break that failed to heal.
Adults recovering from a broken heel bone who want to know what the evidence actually says about surgery, weight bearing, and the realistic timeline.
You are in the first days after the injury with a tight, increasingly painful foot. Stop reading and get to an emergency room.
Want the full evidence? Keep scrolling
Ranked by how strong the evidence actually is, not by how commonly it is done.
Compartment check, spine check, circulation check, open wound check, and a look at the other heel because bilateral injuries get missed. Getting this wrong costs a limb or a spinal cord. Getting the exercise dose wrong costs a few weeks.
Around one in three people treated surgically still scored in the impaired range on foot function questionnaires at an average of nearly five years. The severity of the original crush, measured on the first X-ray, predicts the two-year outcome regardless of what treatment follows. People do better when they are told this at the start rather than discovering it at month six.
In the one group of 78 patients reporting exact timings, movement started at two weeks after fixation and the surgical correction held: heel angle 31.7 degrees at two weeks and 30.1 degrees at an average of nearly four years later. Ankle bend-up range recovered fully. Pointing the toes down and turning the sole inward did not.
What that group actually did
| Joint movement exercise | Started at 2 weeks. Brace removed for movement work whenever not walking |
| Forefoot weight bearing | Allowed at 2 weeks, in a brace or heel-off shoe |
| Walking without a crutch | Allowed at 4 weeks, as tolerated |
These are the timings one group of surgeons used and reported, not a schedule anyone has tested against an alternative. Your surgeon's instructions override all of it.
Across 72 studies, patients were grouped by when they started partial weight bearing: 0 to 4 weeks, 4 to 6, 6 to 8, and 8 to 12. Every measured outcome overlapped between the groups. Heel angle, heel height, function scores, pain, complications. A separate pooling of 20 studies and 1051 fractures found the surgical correction slipped by 0.4 degrees on average with a 13.9% complication rate. The fear that drove the standard rule, that loading collapses the repair, is not visible in the data that exists.
Not one of those studies was randomised. This is a consistent absence of detected harm, which is not the same as proof that it is safe.
Everything below is standard practice rather than tested protocol, because no trial has ever randomised an exercise variable in this fracture. What the research does pin down is which losses persist: pointing the toes down and turning the sole of the foot inward. Bending the ankle upward tends to recover on its own. Those first two are where the effort belongs.
Home programme
| Toe wiggles and ankle pumps 20 reps, hourly while awake, from day one | Circulation and swelling control. Should never be sharp. |
| Knee, hip and glute work on the injured side 3 sets of 10, daily, from day one | Stops the whole leg wasting while the foot rests. |
| Slow ankle circles and alphabet 2 sets of 10 each direction, 2 to 3 times daily, once permitted | Stiffness and stretch are fine. Sharp pain means stop. |
| Turning the sole inward and outward 3 sets of 10, daily, once permitted | The movement most likely to stay stiff permanently. Be stubborn about this one. |
| Seated heel and toe raises 3 sets of 10, daily, once partial weight bearing is allowed | Effort, not sharp pain. |
| Standing calf raise, two legs then one 3 sets of 8 to 10, every other day, once full weight bearing is allowed | Aching calf is the point. No sharp heel pain. |
| Single-leg balance 3 x 30 seconds, daily, once full weight bearing is allowed | Wobbling is fine. Pain is not. Progress to eyes closed, then a cushion. |
The sets and repetitions follow standard practice. Nobody has run a trial comparing exercise doses for this fracture, so anyone quoting you a precise number with confidence is guessing.
Progressive loading, gait retraining, calf and foot strengthening. LOW No trial has randomised any exercise variable in this fracture. Included because the alternative is doing nothing, and because the persistent losses are measurable and worth chasing.
Heel-unloading orthosis. LOW A trial was designed and registered in 2018 to test exactly this. It has not reported results.
Primary joint fusion for the most severe pattern. LOW Across 9 studies and 142 patients, outcomes were not clearly different from reconstructing the bone, and 13.6% of the reconstruction group needed that fusion later anyway.
If any of these apply, stop reading and get medical help now.
Especially if straightening your toes is agony, or the foot feels numb. This is compartment syndrome and it is time-critical. In the published cases, only 10% of people returned to work or their pre-injury activity after the surgery that treats it.
Nerve or circulation involvement. Same day assessment.
High-energy injury. In one series of 62 open heel fractures, 6.4% had a torn artery and 8% eventually needed an amputation. These need a trauma team, not a clinic.
The force that crushes a heel bone keeps travelling up the skeleton. Spinal fractures were found in 14.5% of that same open-fracture series, and lumbar fractures in 9.6%. It gets missed because everyone is looking at the foot.
Not an emergency, but not something to push through either. This is the pattern of arthritis developing in the joint above the heel bone, and it needs assessing rather than more exercise.
Criteria rather than dates. The calendar does not know how your foot is doing.
Impact returns last, and for some people it does not return completely. Patients who went on to have the joint above the heel fused returned to close to their previous amount of recreational sport, but shifted from high-impact activities to low-impact ones.
CONVICTION: MODERATE
Not one number, because the evidence is much stronger for some of these claims than others.
Go Deeper
Recovering from a serious injury and not sure which advice to trust? The Verdict reads the actual trials so you do not have to. One evidence review a week, free.
Join The VerdictThe heel bone is a thin outer shell of hard bone packed with spongy bone inside. It carries your body weight down through the joint that sits on top of it, and it anchors the Achilles tendon at the back.
When you land from height, the ankle bone above is driven down into it like a wedge. The joint surface splits and the shell blows outward. The heel ends up shorter, wider, and often tipped inward.
About three quarters of these fractures break into the joint. That single fact drives everything else. Bone knits back. The cartilage lining a weight-bearing joint does not, which is why the long-term problem is arthritis in that joint rather than a break that failed to unite.
The mechanism also explains why the emergency room checks your spine. A force big enough to crush the heel bone keeps travelling up the skeleton, and the thoracolumbar spine is the next thing in its path.
There is no hands-on test for this. Across the 167 studies gathered for this review, there is not a single clinical test with a published score for how good it is at catching this fracture or ruling it out. Diagnosis is X-ray followed by a CT scan. That is an unusual thing for a physical therapy page to say, and pretending otherwise would be worse.
The most useful thing in the history. A fall from height or a car crash with the foot on the pedal, and the person cannot put any weight on it at all from the moment it happened.
Picks up bony tenderness but points at nothing specific. Useful for raising suspicion, useless for ruling anything out.
This measurement appears in nearly every study on this fracture, which makes people assume it is a diagnostic test. It is not. What it does is predict: patients arriving with a severely flattened angle had a poor two-year outcome regardless of which treatment they had.
What else it could be
| Condition | What is different about it |
|---|---|
| Heel stress fracture | Builds gradually over weeks, weight bearing is still possible, usually follows a spike in running or training load. Completely different condition despite the similar name. |
| Ankle bone (talus) fracture | Pain sits in front of the ankle bones rather than in the heel. Occurs alongside a heel fracture in about 19% of open cases. |
| Midfoot (Lisfranc) injury | Tenderness across the middle of the foot, not the heel. |
| Ordinary ankle sprain | Low-energy twisting mechanism, and most people can hobble on it. |
| Tendon dislocation behind the outer ankle bone | Not really an alternative. It rides along with 29.3% of heel fractures, rising to about half of the most severe pattern, and it is routinely missed. |
Veltman et al., 2013. Systematic review of 1,730 fractures
Concluded that the findings support current practice of treating displaced heel fractures surgically, with plate and screw fixation as the method of choice.
Griffin et al., 2014 and Dickenson et al., 2021. UK Heel Fracture Trial, 151 randomised
No difference at two years. No difference at five years. Complications and reoperations were more common after surgery, with an odds ratio of 7.5.
Follow the trials. The review searched the literature only up to 2011, three years before the trial reported, and the single high-quality study it leaned on had a result of its own that showed no difference. A review can outlive its own evidence base and keep being cited as a summary.
Standard practice
Six to nine weeks of no weight bearing after fixation.
De Boer et al., 2018 (72 studies) and Verstappen et al., 2025 (20 studies, 1051 fractures)
Start times anywhere from 0 to 12 weeks produced overlapping results on every measure, with the surgical correction slipping only 0.4 degrees on average.
Follow your surgeon, and know that neither side has won this. The conventional rule was never tested. The evidence against it is entirely non-randomised, so it could be showing us that surgeons only allowed early loading in the patients whose fixation looked solid. Both trials designed to settle the question exist only as registered plans.
What the studies show: every result in this literature is measured from six months onward, most at two years.
The gap: the Cochrane reviewers state it outright. No study has ever reported function within three months of injury. That first twelve weeks contains every weight-bearing decision, every brace choice and every movement exercise.
What that means for you: anyone who gives you a confident early timeline is working from experience and convention rather than from trials, including the timelines on this page. That is worth knowing, and it is not a reason to do nothing.
What the studies show: nearly all of them measure outcome with the same general foot and ankle score.
The gap: Cochrane reports that no threshold has been published telling anyone how much change on that score a patient with this fracture would actually notice. The team running the current weight-bearing trial admit in their own protocol that the score has limited validity here, and use it anyway because everyone else does.
What that means for you: track your own function against how you were last month, and against what your job needs, rather than against a number.
What the studies show: in 96 patients followed for nearly five years, alcohol problems, mental health conditions, being out of work before or after the injury, having multiple injuries, and developing arthritis all predicted worse function. Age, sex, smoking, how it happened, the fracture pattern, whether it was an open fracture, and whether the wound got infected did not.
The gap: a second dataset, following a randomised trial out to 8 to 12 years, found the same shape. The better-outcome half more often had lighter work or had retired, and had no injury compensation claim running.
What that means for you: the support around the injury is not a soft extra. On this evidence it does more work than the surgical decision does.
| Surgery | No surgery | |
|---|---|---|
| Function at 2 years (UK trial, 0 to 100 scale) | 69.8 | 65.7 |
| Function at 5 years (same trial) | 79.2 | 76.4 |
| Difference at 5 years | -0.14 points, statistically indistinguishable (p = 0.975) | |
| Major complications (Canadian trial) | 25% | 18% |
| Complications and reoperations at 2 years | Odds ratio 7.5 in favour of not operating | |
| Extra operations by 5 years | 10 patients | 4 patients |
| Surface wound infection (pooled, 847 patients) | 14% | Not applicable |
| Returning to work within 2 years | No meaningful difference between groups | |
When surgery is still the answer. Fractures where the bone is pressing on the outer ankle bone were deliberately excluded from the UK trial, so its result says nothing about them. Open fractures and dislocations are operated on for the soft tissues and the reduction, not for the score. Severe loss of heel height, width or alignment that will not accept a shoe is a mechanical problem surgery can fix.
How fragile is this field? Worth knowing. A review recalculated every randomised trial on heel fractures and found that, on average, reversing just six patients' results would flip a finding from significant to not significant. That cuts both ways: it is a reason to distrust confident claims in either direction.
The honest summary. Two independent randomised trials, one following people for five years, found that operating on a typical closed displaced heel fracture does not produce a better foot, and does produce more complications and more return trips to theatre. Pooling all the trials together, Cochrane finds a small benefit that it rates low-certainty and cannot say is large enough for a patient to notice. Both paths are defensible. The decision belongs to you and your surgeon, and you should have heard the complication numbers before that conversation rather than after it.
This page summarises 25 sources drawn from 167 studies gathered across 11 literature searches. It is educational information about a serious injury, not personal medical advice, and it does not replace assessment by your surgeon or physical therapist.
Every pain and rehab verdict, evidence-scored: what actually speeds recovery, what to skip, and when to get it checked.
Browse Pain & Rehab verdictsPhysio conditions reviewed against clinical evidence. What works, what doesn't, and what to do — from a practising physiotherapist.
Subscribe freeThe Verdict is built by the same team behind Precision Metrics — a physique and health coaching practice with 300+ clients coached. Dr. Seth Holbrook, DPT and Luke Holbrook lead the coaching.
Book a free consultationConviction-scored verdicts on supplements, nutrition, training, physio, and recovery.